### Spacing lines in tables

(La)TeX mechanisms for maintaining the space between lines (the “leading”) rely on TeX’s paragraph builder, which compares the shape of consecutive lines and adjusts the space between them.

These mechanisms can’t work in exactly the same way when (La)TeX is building a table, because the paragraph builder doesn’t get to see the lines themselves. As a result, tables sometimes typeset with lines uncomfortably close together (or occasionally ridiculously far apart).

Traditional (moving metal type) typographers would adjust the spacing between lines of a table by use of a “strut” (a metal spacer). A TeX user can do exactly the same thing: most macro packages define a `\``strut` command, that defines a space appropriate to the current size of the text; placing a `\``strut` command at the end of a troublesome row is the simplest solution to the problem — if it works. Other solutions below are LaTeX-specific, but some may be simply translated to Plain TeX commands.

If your table exhibits a systematic problem (i.e., every row is wrong by the same amount) use `\``extrarowheight`, which is defined by the array package:

>     \usepackage{array}% in the preamble
>     ...
>     \setlength{\extrarowheight}{length}
>     \begin{tabular}{....}

To correct a single row whose maladjustment isn’t corrected by a `\``strut` command, you can define your own, using `\``rule{0pt}{length}` — which is a near approximation to the command that goes inside a `\``strut`. The bigstrut package defines a strut command that you can use for this purpose: `\``bigstrut` on its own opens up both above and below the current line; `\``bigstrut[t]` opens up above the line, `\``bigstrut[b]` opens up below the line.

General solutions are available, however. The tabls package automatically generates an appropriately-sized strut at the end of each row. Its disadvantages are that it’s really rather slow in operation (since it gets in the way of everything within tables) and its (lack of) compatibility with other packages.

The cellspace does a (possibly inferior) job by defining a new table/array column type “S”, which you apply to each column specification. So, for example,

>     \cmdinvoke{begin}{tabular}{l l l p{3cm}}

would become

>     \cmdinvoke{begin}{tabular}{Sl Sl Sl Sp{3cm}}

and so on. This technique shows promise of not interfering so much with other packages, but this author has heard of no reports from the field.

The booktabs package comes with a thought-provoking essay about how tables should be designed. Since table row-spacing problems most often appear in collisions with rules, the author’s thesis, that LaTeX users tend too often to rule their tables, is interesting. The package provides rule commands to support the author’s scheme, but deals with inter-row spacing too. The most recent release of booktabs sports compatibility with packages such as longtable.

Documentation of both bigstrut and tabls may be found as comments in the package files themselves.

`array.sty`
  Distributed as part of macros/latex/required/tools (gzipped tar, browse)
`bigstrut.sty`
  Distributed as part of macros/latex/contrib/multirow (gzipped tar, browse)
`booktabs.sty`
  macros/latex/contrib/booktabs (gzipped tar, browse)
`cellspace.sty`
  macros/latex/contrib/cellspace (gzipped tar, browse)
`tabls.sty`
  macros/latex/contrib/misc/tabls.sty

This question on the Web: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=struttab